Some scientists look at the boundary between two biological communities and see a sharp dividing line. Others looking at the same boundary see a gradual transition with much intermixing of species and many interactions between communities. Why are there such different interpretations of the same landscape?
This is for the reason that individuals are not continually taking a gander at precisely the same, and on the grounds that individuals' psyches of ten work distinctively and process data in marginally extraordinary ways getting diverse understandings of similar information.
